Thomson Reuters names eight Keystone Law partners in its Stand-out Lawyers Guide 2026
Andrea James, Andrew Darwin & Anna McKibbin
Keynote
14 Sep 2015
•2 min read
If you send marketing communications to consumers based on marketing opt-ins from consumers, especially if relying on data lists you’ve purchased from others, then this briefing note is for you; when a consumer says ‘YES’ to receiving marketing communications by ticking an opt-in box, it can still mean ‘NO’ unless correctly worded and followed.
This week Optical Express found this out to its cost, following the upholding of the Information Commissioner’s enforcement notice by the First Tier Tribunal.
Optical Express is now prohibited from using the supplier data lists it purchased (no doubt at some cost and presumably in good faith). Optical Express may have recourse against the supplier under the data list contract, but that’s typically unusual and, even if it does, any remedy available is most unlikely to compensate for the expected bad publicity and loss of consumer trust.
Why did this happen?
The answer, in brief, is that Optical Express was unable to demonstrate that all persons on the list had given any consent or any adequate consent.
For the opt-in consent wording to have been properly worded, in each case it should have:
What should you do now?