Thomson Reuters names eight Keystone Law partners in its Stand-out Lawyers Guide 2026
Andrea James, Andrew Darwin & Anna McKibbin
Keynote
10 Dec 2020
•3 min read
Whether or not a Brexit deal is ultimately derailed by cod and pollock quotas, data movements between the UK and Europe will continue unabated. In 2018, the formal implementation of GDPR became a material compliance issue for many businesses, and that same regulation will give rise to fresh questions through 2021 as the Brexit barrier is erected between the UK and the EEA from 31 December.
Even if the EU does grant the UK the “adequacy” status which would simplify the continued transfer of data between the two, one (perhaps previously) overlooked article will take much greater significance for those processing data in either territory, namely, the Article 27 obligation to appoint a Representative where the relevant business has no local establishment.
This obligation is reflected in the UK’s post-Brexit application of GDPR (to be known creatively as “UK GDPR”) and mirrors the very same issue faced by UK entities seeking ongoing activities in Europe.
UK GDPR requires the appointment of a UK Representative for any entity:
The requirement is neutral as to form and industry, so applies whether that entity is listed on a stock exchange or is a trust, and whether it is operating in online enterprise, manufacturing yachts or broking PPE supplies. If UK GDPR applies, then so does the requirement to appoint a UK Representative.
The threat of sanctions aims to drive compliance and a fine of 2% of global turnover or €10,000,000, whichever is higher, means that a failure to appoint a UK Representative could signify a substantial error of judgement. It remains to be seen if any funding cuts reflected in the budget of the ICO (the UK data supervisory authority) as a result of COVID-19 encourages a greater degree of enforcement of this provision as well as more generally.
The core principle is that the ICO, and the individuals about whom entities process personal data, should have a first point of contact, which enables barrier-free communication. There is no formal language test, so no matter how well they already speak English, entities who lack a local establishment will still need to appoint a UK Representative. This is not to be confused with the separate obligation to appoint a Data Protection Officer (DPO) where appropriate, but a standalone obligation arising out of a simple test of establishment.
Formal guidance from the EU has helped narrow down the parameters of what is an establishment for GDPR purposes:
Whether or not UK GDPR will apply to an entity’s activities will depend on its actual processing activities. Once that question is resolved, then the establishment test above will identify the need to appoint a UK Representative.
An appointment must be made in writing and then publicised to third parties – normally a line is added to a privacy policy giving the contact details of the UK Representative. The services provided will depend on those offered by the relevant UK Representative. However, for those businesses whose key privacy concerns relate to data loss and cyber-security it will be important to maintain clear distinctions as to who performs which role; privilege must be retained in relation to legal advice, and DPOs must remain independent of DPOs.
For more information on the Article 27 obligation and to discuss whether you need to appoint a data privacy representative, please contact Rupert Casey.